Step-by-step reduction
- A 6 kΩ and a 3 kΩ resistor are in parallel; that combination is in series with 4 kΩ.
- Parallel first: 6k·3k/(6k+3k) = 18/9 = 2 kΩ.
- Then series: 2 kΩ + 4 kΩ = 6 kΩ.
Real circuits contain many resistors, but a source connected to any purely resistive network can't tell the difference between the network and one well-chosen single resistor — its equivalent resistance. Finding that equivalent is the first systematic skill of circuit analysis, and it rests on two patterns.
Elements are in series when they carry the same current — connected end to end, with nothing branching off between them. Voltages along a series chain add, so resistances add too.
Elements are in parallel when they share the same pair of nodes, and therefore the same voltage. Currents through parallel branches add, which means conductances add — and resistance combines by reciprocals.
For exactly two resistors the reciprocal formula collapses to the product-over-sum shortcut — worth committing to memory, along with two of its corollaries: N equal resistors R in parallel give R/N, and a parallel combination is always smaller than its smallest member.
Compute the equivalent of 100 Ω, 220 Ω, and 330 Ω in series.
Two 1 kΩ resistors are in parallel. What's the equivalent, and why might a designer do this instead of using one 500 Ω part?
Find R_eq for 60 Ω, 30 Ω, and 20 Ω in parallel.
A 2 kΩ resistor is in series with the parallel combination of 6 kΩ and 12 kΩ. The whole network sits across 12 V. Find R_eq and the current drawn from the source.